In retirement, Peter Ellinger, at an advanced age, pens his Memoirs, embarking on a journey rooted in 1933 Vienna, coinciding with Hitler's rise to power. Part I unfolds his escape from Austria to Israel, navigating influences of Austrian heritage and the Zionist perspective. Arriving in a British-mandated Palestine, he witnesses Israel's birth, practices law in Tel Aviv, and delves into Bible Critique. Part II explores his Oxford postgraduate years, academic career, and early Singapore, encompassing its transition into a city-state and union with Malaysia. His 43-year marriage to Patricia, concluding with her death from leukemia, is detailed. Part III covers his global academia stint and Hamburg sojourn, foreseeing the fall of the Berlin Wall. Part IV reflects on his second Singapore phase, NUS employment, and legal practice before full retirement.

Excerpt - "Letter 5: The Independence Move"

Letter 5: The Independence Move

It is common to regard childhood as being followed by boyhood; but I find the two overlapping. The distinction is, I believe, arbitrary. My own progress was from childhood to youth. It took place during my holidays in Motza: From then on, I developed my skill of politely doubting everything. Acceptance of matters preached in sermons, be they anchored in faith or in dogma, became subject to my own analysis. So was the daily metamorphosis from my home image to my primary school or world image. Still, during my last two years in Ahad Ha’am, I moved closer to the idols of the school — the idols of the Yishuv —and, in many ways, distanced myself from the milieu of my Viennese home. It amuses me to recall that, even at home, I tended to solicit a modicum of orthodoxy and, of course, Zionism...

The encounter in Rothschild Boulevard made me realise the danger of extreme reactions and approaches to violent situations and the importance of a cool head. It reinforced my tendency to consider everything before subscribing to a dogma or an orientation. Shortly thereafter, a chat with my teacher, Mr Livni, made me think about matters religious. When our school reopened, he talked to me about the letter I had sent him from Motza. He felt disappointed by the opening of my letter by Ms Greenberg. His main concern, though, was my observation about free choice. He agreed that the stages in the life of a human being were preordained. But he failed to see what this had to do with the notion of free choice. "But, Sir, why must a person grow up if he does not want to become an adult?”
“Well?”
“Where is his ‘free choice’?”
“I see what you mean. But, Eli, free choice refers only to the option between good and evil.”
“But why?”
“You must learn to opt for good in all the stages of your life: childhood, youth, mid-life and old age. The stages in a human’s life are preordained.”
“But, then, how do we distinguish between good and evil?”
“You can always find the answer in the Bible and in our traditions. Good is what God wants; evil is opposed to his teachings."

For a while, the answer satisfied me. It then occurred to me that both ‘good’ and ‘evil’ were hard to define and identify. Was it really ‘evil 'to switch the light on after dusk on Friday evening — Sabbath eve? Could we dub everything forbidden under any faith as being evil per se? It took me years to try to work out the answer. Doubts, though, set in from the very start. Odd to say, they have remained intact to this very day when I am close to 90 years old.